|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

thoth foc
Elcyion Lacar
|
Posted - 2007.03.08 20:44:00 -
[1]
welcome to napland _________________________ xMenta (DSMA) xBOS (CA) xATUK (.5.) xDICE (BOB) |

thoth foc
Elcyion Lacar
|
Posted - 2007.03.08 20:51:00 -
[2]
Edited by: thoth foc on 08/03/2007 20:48:42
Originally by: Phrixus Zephyr
Originally by: thoth foc welcome to napland
Post with you main 
LOL.. 
edit: i am assume that was an attempt at a joke  _________________________ xMenta (DSMA) xBOS (CA) xATUK (.5.) xDICE (BOB) |

thoth foc
Elcyion Lacar
|
Posted - 2007.03.09 08:51:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Phrixus Zephyr
Originally by: Izzy Pol
Originally by: Arrgs
Originally by: Phrixus Zephyr
Originally by: thoth foc welcome to napland
Post with you main 
I hope that's a joke.
No, sadly its all he can say.
Post with your main.*
Subtilty hint z02-4a; No rolleyes smilie
.
.
.
.

tbh it's well past subtle and slap bang in the middle of obscure 
hence i followed the thought pattern 
 _________________________ xMenta (DSMA) xBOS (CA) xATUK (.5.) xDICE (BOB) |

thoth foc
Elcyion Lacar
|
Posted - 2007.03.09 09:46:00 -
[4]
Edited by: thoth foc on 09/03/2007 09:43:15
Originally by: Weka Dart
Originally by: thoth foc welcome to napland
'welcome to nobland'
The irony 
@Hedeon Mishenka the list of things hasnt put you off d2.. why only let it put you off BOB? _________________________ xMenta (DSMA) xBOS (CA) xATUK (.5.) xDICE (BOB) |

thoth foc
Elcyion Lacar
|
Posted - 2007.03.09 11:22:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Weka Dart
Originally by: thoth foc Edited by: thoth foc on 09/03/2007 09:43:15
Originally by: Weka Dart
Originally by: thoth foc welcome to napland
'welcome to nobland'
The irony 
@Hedeon Mishenka the list of things hasnt put you off d2.. why only let it put you off BOB?
I'm not gonna keep telling u btw
Stop posting smak on the forum
Don't let ur blue status fool u, if u don't stfu I will pop u next time I see u or ur other character who is still in the alliance.
I dont think your coalition leaders will be amused if you start shooting my FLA alt You firing on blues, would make them 

_________________________ xMenta (DSMA) xBOS (CA) xATUK (.5.) xDICE (BOB) |

thoth foc
Elcyion Lacar
|
Posted - 2007.03.09 14:32:00 -
[6]
Originally by: hired goon I always laugh at the people calling the north 'napland'. NAP stands for Non Agression Pact, and holding joint ops/defending eachothers space is something different from that, it's called a 'military alliance'.
The difference is not lost on me, my references are simplified, to save me the unintersting task of explaining the difference..
It is actually your inability to stand alone that points to how weak you are as groups..
Groups like FIX etc. will always deserve much more respect than the likes of D2 and "northern slaves".. FIX are a group in themselves, more complete and capable than the 6.. 8.. 10 northern alliances that currently getting spanked about querious.. _________________________ xMenta (DSMA) xBOS (CA) xATUK (.5.) xDICE (BOB) |

thoth foc
Elcyion Lacar
|
Posted - 2007.03.09 14:49:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Joerd Toastius
Originally by: thoth foc It is actually your inability to stand alone that points to how weak you are as groups..
That doesn't make sense.
read it slowly then _________________________ xMenta (DSMA) xBOS (CA) xATUK (.5.) xDICE (BOB) |

thoth foc
Elcyion Lacar
|
Posted - 2007.03.09 14:58:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Joerd Toastius
Originally by: thoth foc
Originally by: Joerd Toastius
Originally by: thoth foc It is actually your inability to stand alone that points to how weak you are as groups..
That doesn't make sense.
read it slowly then
The problem isn't my reading. The problem is that your conclusion doesn't follow from your premiss.
I'm not sure, if i can reword it any simpler,
if it's a matter that you dont agree on the measure of strength or something, that's fine, everyone has their own opinion.. _________________________ xMenta (DSMA) xBOS (CA) xATUK (.5.) xDICE (BOB) |

thoth foc
Elcyion Lacar
|
Posted - 2007.03.09 15:07:00 -
[9]
Originally by: hired goon
Originally by: thoth foc
Groups like FIX etc. will always deserve much more respect than the likes of D2 and "northern slaves".. FIX are a group in themselves, more complete and capable than the 6.. 8.. 10 northern alliances that currently getting spanked about querious..
Hah, hah. Are you serious? I don't want to turn this into a smackathread but... FIX? Just no. I won't attempt to explain because of the character limit of the forum, and because I really don't need to persuade pretty much anyone who's read your silly statement here.
tbh this reply looks like it is based on your own arrogance about yourselves.. opinons about yourselves, i dont share..
All groups have their strengths and weakness, and everyone judges these based on their own experiences.. _________________________ xMenta (DSMA) xBOS (CA) xATUK (.5.) xDICE (BOB) |

thoth foc
Elcyion Lacar
|
Posted - 2007.03.09 15:09:00 -
[10]
Originally by: thoth foc weak you are as groups..
Originally by: Joerd Toastius "You are weak as a group"
problem found _________________________ xMenta (DSMA) xBOS (CA) xATUK (.5.) xDICE (BOB) |
|

thoth foc
Elcyion Lacar
|
Posted - 2007.03.09 15:18:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Joerd Toastius
Originally by: thoth foc
Originally by: thoth foc weak you are as groups..
Originally by: Joerd Toastius "You are weak as a group"
problem found
Huh? I figured you were just doing a Yoda impression there. If what I said's not what you meant, what did you mean?
I'll mail you later if you really want me to explain, i'll only get cried at for smacking if post it here (ppl never like to hear opinions if they arent "OMG YOUR UBER") and the mods have already nerfed me once for drifting off topic  _________________________ xMenta (DSMA) xBOS (CA) xATUK (.5.) xDICE (BOB) |

thoth foc
Elcyion Lacar
|
Posted - 2007.03.09 19:00:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Raketefrau Why the hell *should* we stand alone? We don't have the same "ours is bigger" need as a lot of the corps/alliances in Eve, and there's nothing wrong with that.
This attitude that naps == weak is just ridiculous. Politics aren't as simple as "we can beat the crap out of everyone." If they were, this would be a very boring game.
Uniformity tend to be very boring no matter what the subject. Should we really post of our shock and disbelief about yet another northern NAP?
Anyway.. You disagree with the naps == weak premise, yet your own allies have already said how your agreements are more military defence agreements. Then you ask why should stand alone that you dont have the epeen complex etc. The simple answer is you shouldnt. why? because no one really would expects you could stand against the "big boys". Which is fair enough, my corp couldnt either..
Now when i say this, ppl cry smack.. but isnt this basically what you have just said also?
Alot of my posts are as much to tease ppl, that will get upset about them.. most of which get upset without actually considering why.. if you are really confident in your choices and decisions then what others see as smack is just another opinion. Isnt that why so many replies are alts? because they are actually ashamed of their own opinions..
So i tip my hat for your confident reply.. _________________________ xMenta (DSMA) xBOS (CA) xATUK (.5.) xDICE (BOB) |

thoth foc
Elcyion Lacar
|
Posted - 2007.03.10 00:09:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Joerd Toastius
Originally by: thoth foc
Originally by: Raketefrau Why the hell *should* we stand alone? We don't have the same "ours is bigger" need as a lot of the corps/alliances in Eve, and there's nothing wrong with that.
This attitude that naps == weak is just ridiculous. Politics aren't as simple as "we can beat the crap out of everyone." If they were, this would be a very boring game.
Uniformity tend to be very boring no matter what the subject. Should we really post of our shock and disbelief about yet another northern NAP?
Anyway.. You disagree with the naps == weak premise, yet your own allies have already said how your agreements are more military defence agreements. Then you ask why should stand alone that you dont have the epeen complex etc. The simple answer is you shouldnt. why? because no one really would expects you could stand against the "big boys". Which is fair enough, my corp couldnt either.
But if "naps = weak", BoB is "weak" because it's NAPed with LV, and RA is "weak" because it's NAPed with the Goons etc, no?
And if by "weak" all you mean is "small", then I guess your point kinda stands, but I don't see how it's particularly interesting. Yes, most of the northern alliances are smaller than the southern mega-blobs... ok, so?
As hired goon said, not every agreement is the same.. as i previously said, i use NAP as a simplication...
And btw using RA as an example isnt prolly the best in my case, I havent fought RA since ATUK lived in the region, but at the time they avoided fighting us at all costs, choosing to POS spam instead.. maybe they have improved, unfortunately i wont take forum propaganda as evident of that..
@Phrixus Zephyr: as i mailed you, your assumption that i am still a member is bob is incorrect, apart from that I agree shooting an enemy is far more interesting than shooting randoms.. i guess this is why this is my first period outside alliance politics..
_________________________ xMenta (DSMA) xBOS (CA) xATUK (.5.) xDICE (BOB) |
|
|
|